Three ways to add developers. One honest comparison.

Staff augmentation, freelancers, or a project agency: each is right for something. Here is where each wins, and where the costs hide.

Staff augmentation (Betterfit)FreelancersProject agency
Who vets the talentBetterfit, against production work, before you meet anyoneYou do, one profile at a timeThe agency, criteria usually opaque
Who manages after startBetterfit stays involved: onboarding, check-ins, growthYou do, entirelyProject manager, focused on the contract
Continuity98% of placed engineers stay; they join your teamEnds when the freelancer's next gig startsTeam rotates at the agency's discretion
Cost model45 to 63% below local hiring (published client results)Low rate, high management and rework costProject premium, agency margin on every hour
Start speedShortlist in days, shipping within weeksFast to hire, slow to make productiveWeeks of scoping before the first commit
Team integrationFull seat on your team, your standups, your toolsOutside contributorSeparate team, handoffs at the boundary
Mauricio Lopez
Mauricio LopezDirector of Product @Inex

“Betterfit doesn’t just place developers, they built our entire engineering team. Every single engineer at Inex came through them, and the quality has been consistently exceptional. What sets them apart is how well they understand what we actually need, not just technically but culturally. They’ve become a true partner in our growth.”

Common questions.

What is staff augmentation?

Adding vetted engineers to your existing team, managed as team members rather than external contractors. You direct the work; Betterfit handles sourcing, vetting, contracts, pay, and ongoing support.

When are freelancers the right call?

Short, well-scoped tasks with low integration needs. For anything living inside your codebase for months, the management and continuity costs usually outgrow the rate advantage.

When is a project agency the right call?

Fixed-scope deliverables you want fully outsourced, like a marketing site or an MVP you will not maintain in-house. For a lasting product team, the handoff boundary becomes the bottleneck. Betterfit also offers fixed-scope On Demand delivery when that fits better.

How does Betterfit's model stay 45 to 63% below local hiring?

Senior engineers from lower-cost markets, vetted to one bar, placed into your team and managed for the long term. Published results: Inex 63%, Follosoft 55%, GridBank 50%, ProAthlete 45%. Retention across placements is 98%.

Sources: 1. Government of Canada Job Bank, NOC 21232 (Software developers and programmers), regional hourly wages, reference period 2023-2024, retrieved July 24, 2026. 2. Robert Half 2026 Canada Salary Guide, senior software developer annual ranges by city. 3. Client savings published at betterfit.ca/work. Local cost is salary only, before employer taxes, benefits, and overhead.